Oregon's civil commitment, statute: Stone's "thank-you theory" - a judicial survey.
نویسندگان
چکیده
The object of this paper is to examine judicial attitudes toward the Oregon civil commitment law as measured by a questionnaire recently circulated to all Oregon Circuit Court judges having jurisdiction for civil commitment of individuals under Oregon law. The questionnaire had two main purposes. The first was to look at certain aspects of the current statute and get the judges' perspectives on its strengths and weaknesses. The second purpose was to get the judges' opinions on a theory formulated by Alan Stone which he calls the "thank you theory" of civil commitment. l To accomplish this second goal each judge was asked to review Stone's theory in detail and then to give his views on strengths and weaknesses embodied in this potential approach to civil commitment. Finally, each was asked to state whether he would support a new statute based on this approach. This paper will of necessity focus on certain areas of civil commitment which are unique to the Oregon area, as certain of the procedures adopted here do not exist, to our knowledge, in other states. The particular problems in Oregon highlight often-repeated themes which exist with most of the newer civil commitment statutes around the country. The Oregon civil commitment statute was modified in the 1973-74 legislature. Shore2.3 summarized the history of this change, along with some of the consequences of the change in statutes. In addition he compared the commitment process in various western states. Using Treffert's criteria4 of a model commitment statute, Oregon achieved a rating of 15 points which was in the middle of the state-by-state rating. Briefly, the Oregon statute allows for five day emergency hospitalization and treatment under either a police or a physician "hold." During this emergency hospitalization the local county mental health office conducts a pre-commitment investigation by interviewing the allegedly mentally ill person, the petitioner, and others on the ward where the person is
منابع مشابه
Limitations of constitutional protections in Jackson v. Indiana pertaining to charges with no statute of limitations.
There has been a long-standing link between the civil and criminal commitment procedures for individuals found incompetent to stand trial (IST). In the criminal system, when restoration of competency fails to be realized in a reasonable time, the civil commitment process becomes the default system for commitment. While there have been recent calls for improved mechanisms for predicting competen...
متن کاملA methodology for predicting the effects of changes in civil commitment decision making.
We review a three-step civil commitment model and formulas for calculating the probability of release from commitment and the relative importance of the three steps in determining the outcome. New formulas are developed which enable predictions to be made about the effects of changes on the outcome of the three steps on the release probability. With the use of data from Oregon's civil commitmen...
متن کاملThe civil commitment of sexually violent predators: a unique Texas approach.
Numerous states have enacted statutes focusing on the civil commitment of sexually violent predators. The Texas statute, like many others, calls for the involuntary commitment of those with a mental abnormality--specifically in Texas, a behavioral abnormality--who are likely to engage in predatory acts of sexual violence. All of these states, except Texas, have passed legislation creating inpat...
متن کاملThe Creation and Expansion of the International Criminal Court: A Legal Explanation
International courts have proliferated in the international system in the past century, with one hundred judicial or quasi-judicial bodies currently in existence. While the supply of international courts has increased substantially, state level support for international courts varies across states, across courts, and over time. This paper focuses on the cross-sectional and temporal variation in...
متن کاملThirty-five years of working with civil commitment statutes.
This commentary reflects my 35 years of working with civil commitment statutes, first in Alaska, then in Oregon, and on various committees on the national level. Coming from a background in community and public psychiatry, I have always considered civil commitment to be the most important forensic mental health statute, as the commitment process in any state greatly influences the lives of many...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- The Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law
دوره 7 4 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 1979